Join the actual working environment
We agree on access, review standards and decision rights, then work in your repositories and task system. Existing engineers should be able to see what changed and why without attending an extra reporting meeting.
Ongoing delivery
An embedded engineering team on your roadmap
Bring senior engineers into the work your team is already doing. We share the backlog, review code together and stay close to the people who use the software.
Discuss an embedded team- Working relationship
- Part of your delivery team
- Scope
- A prioritized, evolving backlog
- Your point person
- Product or engineering owner
When it fits
The work this arrangement is built for
You have a continuing product or AI roadmap, an internal owner who can make decisions, and more work than the current team can responsibly take on.
If the outcome is contained and has a clear finish line, project delivery may be easier to manage. If your team can build but needs direction, consider technical leadership.
What working together looks like
Make priorities explicit
Your owner and our delivery lead keep the next pieces of work small enough to review. New requests are discussed against the current priorities, so urgent work does not quietly displace an agreed release.
Build knowledge as we build software
Pull requests, demos and operational notes are part of delivery. Pairing and code review spread the context your team will need to maintain the system.
Clear responsibilities on both sides
| The work | Your team | dplyz |
|---|---|---|
| Priorities | Choose the business outcome and resolve tradeoffs. | Break down the work and explain delivery implications. |
| Delivery | Provide timely domain feedback and reviews. | Implement, test and demonstrate working changes. |
| Operation | Name the system owner and approve release access. | Add runbooks, monitoring and an agreed support handoff. |
What stays with you
Work your team can keep using
- Working software in your repositories
- An up-to-date backlog and decision record
- Tests and operational documentation
- Knowledge shared with your internal engineers
Questions about embedded team
Yes. Shared code review, planning and technical standards are central to this model. We agree on ownership so two teams do not end up maintaining competing approaches.
The team adds engineering capacity, but the engagement also defines delivery ownership and technical coordination. We agree explicitly on which responsibilities remain with your managers.
We plan a transition around the people taking ownership. Documentation, paired sessions and unresolved issues are included in the handover scope.
Let’s work out the right fit
Tell us what you need to accomplish and who is already involved. We can shape the engagement around that.